Monday, May 25, 2015

140Law - Legal Headlines for the Week of May 18th

Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:


- Rachel Spence, Law Clerk & Office Manager

Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

140Law - Recent Legal Headlines

Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:


- Rachel Spence
Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

Migrating from Windows Live Mail to MS-Outlook

Which email client does your law office use?

I raise this question, as the purchase of a new computer for my desktop has necessitated the migration of all my emails – around 20 Gigs worth – to my new machine.

Out of habit, if nothing else, we have used Windows Live Mail as my office’s email client of choice.

While I suspect MS-Outlook has long been most lawyers’ preferred email software, I was always fond of Outlook Express, the predecessor to Windows Live Mail. When OE was discontinued, we migrated to Windows Live Mail as the path of least resistance.

Windows Live Mail, however, has become increasingly clunky over the years, and key, “can’t live without them” features, such as the ability to use email stationary, have for unfathomable reasons, simply been eliminated from the software.

We worked around these limitations by continuing our use of older, legacy versions of this software. And it worked just fine.

As we discovered, however, Windows 8.1 does not appear to allow the installation of these legacy versions.

As a result, I have made a long-avoided migration to MS-Outlook.

The migration process was a rather simple, if time-consuming, three-step process.


  • First, I exported all required emails from Windows Live Mail to a version of Outlook that was already installed on my old computer. Note that to use this method, it is necessary to have Outlook installed (with a profile set up) on the computer from which the export is being done;


  • Using Outlook on my old computer, I then exported all emails, via the resulting PST file, to our data server, where it will also be permanently archived for backup purposes;


  • Using Outlook on my new desktop, I imported the PST file from our data server, and my emails, including storage folders and subfolders, were restored.

  • My email life can now seamlessly carry on.

    Outlook has numerous advantages over Windows Live Mail that were apparent even in this transition process.

    Windows Live does not support exporting directly to our data server, for example. The software’s export function only allows saving to the desktop that hosts the program. This makes backing up and archiving a very cumbersome process.

    The ability to export to a single PST file also has numerous advantages for archiving purposes.

    So I am finally aboard the Outlook train.

    Are there any other Windows Live Mail holdouts out there?
    - Garry J. Wise, Toronto


    Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

    Monday, May 11, 2015

    140Law - Legal Headlines for the Week of May 4, 2015

    Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:
    -Rachel Spence, Law Clerk

    Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

    Monday, May 04, 2015

    140 Law - Leading Legal Headlines for the Week of April 27, 2015

    Here are the leading legal headlines for the week of April 27, 2015 from Wise Law on Twitter:

    -Rachel Spence, Law Clerk
    Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

    Thursday, April 30, 2015

    Mobilegeddon: Is Your Law Firm Website Ready to Pass Google’s New Mobile-Friendliness Test?

    Some call it Mobilegeddon.

    Google began to roll out a mobile-friendliness update last Tuesday, April 21, 2015.  With this latest, major algorithmic change, Google will now be boosting search rankings of mobile-friendly web pages on its mobile search results.

    A page is eligible for the “mobile-friendly” label if it meets the following criteria as detected by Googlebot:
    • Avoids software that is not common on mobile devices, like Flash
    • Uses text that is readable without zooming
    • Sizes content to the screen so users don’t have to scroll horizontally or zoom
    • Places links far enough apart so that the correct one can be easily tappedHow will this algorithmic change affect your law firm website’s search results?
    Your website’s traffic from search results will begin to be impacted by whether it passes or fails Google’s mobile optimization requirements.  With failure, your site’s search rankings on mobile searches may take a serious hit.

    While early indications are that the sky has not yet fallen, and only modest fluctuations in search results are at this point being seen, it’s important to note this update is still in its implementation phase.

    The long-term impact of this change may not yet be fully apparent.

    Many commentators, including Kevin O’Keefe of LexBlog, forecast significant negative consequences for law firm websites that fail the mobile-friendliness test:

    Those law firms who don’t act will suffer the consequences of their content being ranked well below mobile friendly content on smart phones – the result will be significant reductions in search traffic.

    Google has published a mobile-friendliness test tool that allows you to easily check whether your website pages are mobile-compliant. Note that this test applies to each individual page, rather than entire websites.

    If your key pages don’t pass the test, this might be a really good time to be in contact with a web developer about updating your site.

    (Cross Posted at Slaw)
    - Garry J. Wise, Toronto

    Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

    Monday, April 20, 2015

    Canadian Anti-Spam Legislation Cracks Down on Plenty of Fish

    Global News recently reported that popular free-dating site Plenty of Fish (POF) paid $48,000.00 for violating Canada's anti-spam legislation that came in to effect on July 1, 2014.

    The violations happened within a 4 month window between July 1 and October 8, 2014. POF is accused by the CRTC of sending emails to users with:
    "an unsubscribe mechanism that was not clearly and prominently set out, and which could not be readily performed, as required by the legislation." 
    Just a reminder to businesses that you must receive explicit consent, not implied consent, to send a user or client an email.

    Read more here.
    - Rachel Spence, Law Clerk

    Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

    You've Been Served - On Facebook

    In a March 27, 2015 decision in Baidoo v Blood-Dzraku, 2015 NY Slip Op 25096, New York County Supreme Court Judge Mathew Cooper permitted substituted service of a divorce summons via Facebook: 

    As recently as ten years ago, it was considered a cutting edge development in civil practice for a court to allow the service of a summons by email. Since then, email has all but replaced ordinary mail as a means of written communication. And while the legislature has yet to make email a statutorily authorized method for the service of process, courts are now routinely permitting it as a form of alternative service. 
    The past decade has also seen the advent and ascendency of social media, with websites such as Facebook and Twitter occupying a central place in the lives of so many people. Thus, it would appear that the next frontier in the developing law of the service of process over the internet is the use of social media sites as forums through which a summons can be delivered. In this matrimonial action, the issue before the court, by way of plaintiff-wife's ex parte application, is whether she may serve defendant-husband with the divorce summons solely by sending it through Facebook by private message to his account.
    While there has been much buzz in the press about this New York ruling, from a Canadian perspective, substituted service by Facebook is by no means a new development.

    In fact, such service has been ordered by Canadian courts, at least occasionally, since 2009.

    As discussed in a 2009 post on this blog, Alberta Court Allows Substituted Service By Facebook, in Knott v. Sutherland, [2009] A.J. No. 1539 (Alta. Q.B)., Master Breitkreuz permitted substituted service upon one of the multiple defendants in an action by sending notice of the action to the Facebook profile of that defendant.

    In the British Columbia case of Bryne v. Howard, [2010] FMCAFAM 509 (Fed. Mag. Ct.), service of a child support application via Facebook and other electronic means, was permitted.

    As well, in the unreported 2014 Ontario Superior Court Justice case of  Juzytsch v. Terlecki, Madame Justice Susan Healy also permitted substituted service of a Statement of Claim via Facebook.

    As was noted in the 2013 ruling of the B.C. Supreme Court in Burke v. Doe, a defamation case involving former former Toronto Maple Leaf General Manager Brian Burke, Canadian courts have also permitted substituted service via message boards and Twitter. 

    In permitting service via personal message on a message board in the Burke case, Master MacNaughton held:
    [21] In my view, it is reasonably likely, or probable, that notice of the proceedings will come to the attention of the Message Board Defendants by the proposed method. Mr. Brandt’s affidavit establishes that, according to their profiles on the message boards, the Message Board Defendants regularly log into the very accounts on which they posted the allegedly defamatory statements and use message boards and the Internet as a regular means of communication. They will be notified that they have received a personal message upon logging into their account in an online forum in which they have chosen to participate. 
    [22] In all these circumstances, I order that Mr. Burke may serve the notice of civil claim, filed April 26, 2012, on the Message Board Defendants by sending them a private message to the internet message board accounts maintained by them in the form attached to the notice of application. I required the form of the message to be amended to include the name and contact information of the lawyer at Heenan Blaikie from whom the Message Board Defendants may obtain the notice of civil claim and a copy of this order. In addition, I ordered that a similar notice be published in one edition of a national Canadian newspaper.
    We would expect this trend of substituted service by social media to continue and develop as new modes of communication are adopted for more frequent use in the mainstream. 

    - Garry J. Wise and Kenneth R. Bandeira, Toronto



    140 Law - Leading Legal Headlines

    Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:
    - Rachel Spence, Law Clerk

    Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net

    Friday, April 17, 2015

    Getting Your Legal Writing Right

    I remember the time that a favourite client of mine gave me a schooling in the art of legal writing – and proofreading.

    A retired lawyer (and the consummate gentleman), he had retained me to draft revisions to a fairly complex Last Will and Testament.

    He was a bit of a stickler. And I’m fortunate to have had the opportunity to have worked with him. Because even though my content was fine, he still had lots to say about the way my draft was set up.
    Here, in a nutshell, is what I learned from him.

    Precision and consistency in style, capitalization and formatting can be at least as important as content in the creation of legal documentation that meets the standards of our profession.

    In other words:

    • Consistent Capitals, Please: If you are capitalizing Executor in one paragraph, you need to capitalize that word everywhere in the document. This holds true in pleadings as well. If Respondent reappears in your document, be consistent in whether you capitalize it;
    • Don’t mix and match your semicolons and periods: If you are working on a list, use semicolons throughout, except for the last paragraph of your list, which should end with a period;
    • Don’t mess with gender: “His/her” is probably never appropriate in a legal document, and certainly is not appropriate when dealing with a single person. Take the time to verify that your gender descriptions fit your document – especially when you are working from templates and precedents;
    • Paragraph numbering: To avoid errors in paragraph numbering, especially when editing, always use automatic formatting for paragraphs and lists;
    • Proofread once, twice and then proofread again. The same goes for spell checking – this should be done after every revision;
    • Use section titles:  These will make your document easier to read. Once again, consistency matters. If you are using titles, decide whether you will be underlining them, using bold font, or both, and stick to that same selection throughout your document;
    • Revisit your draft. Where possible, after you have finished your document, put it away for a few hours or a day before sending it out. Come back to it later to do a final check. You could be surprised at the number of obvious errors – in content and style – you may find when you have fresh eyes available.
    Yes, it really does matter that you get it right.

    As a lawyer, you are among other things, a professional writer. Your work product is your calling card, and it will go a long way, particularly when you’re starting out, toward establishing how your clients and colleagues assess you.

    (As well, your supervising lawyer will probably not appreciate being called upon repeatedly to edit sloppiness, spelling mistakes, typos, formatting errors, and grammatical problems you could have found yourself in your draft).

    So that’s a wrap on this week’s tip:  Take the time to get your writing right. It will make a difference.

    Because it will demonstrate that you care.

    (Cross-posted at SlawTips)
    - Garry J. Wise, Toronto

    Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net